Territory gameplay

[Simon]

There should be territory objective gameplay. This means when 1 side wins they choose another territory to attack (something like Red Orchestra 2 has).

Would make it a lot better instead of just changing maps. And when they win all the objectives they win the game and other session starts.

 

[Zainab]

Hmm, not bad idea but by this game realism is downed maybe....i would rather have objectives like capture places and when one place captured more are unlocked for battles etc....

 

[mmiedzianyy]

I don't think so.. player sometimes would choose map which was not in the right order of events and that would be unrealistic..

 

[Zainab]

I don't think so.. player sometimes would choose map which was not in the right order of events and that would be unrealistic..

I said the places not whole map..when one events finishes the other event places becomes unlock etc

 

[mmiedzianyy]

I said the places not whole map..when one events finishes the other event places becomes unlock etc

Battlefield/front should move fluently, something simmilar to Rush in BF3 or Push in Insurgency. All this gamemodes are simmilar with each other, even RO2 Territory mode. And i belive that TW will not be different, it's the most realistic approach i have seen so far.

 

[Aniallator]

IMO, just do it the way Insurgency does; after one, or two, or however many rounds, there's a vote for the next map.